I couldn’t find anything online about this lecture, so here is my experience: 
you should do the assignments and self assesment, so the final exam is easier. Prof. Homolka said no one has ever choosen the other path
if you study the learning points given by the lecturers, you’ll be able to do the final exam quite easy
here is my document with several learning points ( some parts of Prof. Birkfellner are missing which should also be studied for the final exam) :
learning_points.pdf (2.67 MB)
Thanks a lot!!! <3
Do you maybe remeber which learing points were asked?
I am having an issue with the time to study for the next exam, so I would appreciate to kinda know which learing points are important and which less important.
Exam 07.24.pdf (374 KB)
Exam from July 2024
Exam June 2025:
Homolka:, one question was about naming and shortly describing 4 raw data corrections that happen before reconstruction; the other one was about HU (definition, what value 0 means, how HU behave for harder spectra);
Birkfellner: what the projection matrix of a gamma camera looks like (??); the other one of why system matrix inversion is a „feeble“ process, as in what are issues in algebraic reconstruction when you need to compute the inverse.
For studying:
For Homolka you read the Tuwel books and make an honest effort at answering the quizzes yourself, then you should really have all you need to know, I found studying for his part much easier than for Birkfellner. There is a document answering the learning points provided for both sections in the forum TPH, though I think it would be better to answer those yourself if you’re not pressed on time . Also the open questions he asked were basically things he really discussed a lot in his materials and in his quizzes, so no surprises there.
The Birkfellner assignments are easy and can be done with low effort; however I’m still confused as to what learning points and ultimately open questions he asked, I had somewhat of a different impression from just reading his slides, though they themselves were easy to understand. He asks some questions I found to not be treated in his slides?? Maybe it would’ve been better to go to his lectures?
So all in all, section 2 is very doable, section 1 is too but I guess might have weird surprises at the final exam (or maybe I was not interested enough in algebraic reconstruction)